<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Silver Light Exposed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sliverlight.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sliverlight.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Do you see the light?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 18:16:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Iron Ruby Released pre-alpha by enigmae22</title>
		<link>http://sliverlight.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/ironruby-released-pre-alpha/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>enigmae22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 18:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sliverlight.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/ironruby-released-pre-alpha/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Yes these would be competing languages, but now the main difference is that IronRuby will be created by Microsoft, and with that based on the DLR while Gardens Point is doing its own &quot;DLR&quot; with ruby, the way the DLR is expected to work is that it will be used by any Dynamic Languages, like IronPython, IronRuby, Visual Basic X, and Managed Javascript(forgive the naming i think there are 4 main dynamic languages supported on DLR for now) all taking advantage of DLR and then also supported for Silverlight support.  

I am not familiar with Gardens Point, however i think IronRuby and DLR will have its own CoreCLR supporting security (using transparent (http://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa/archive/2005/08/31/458641.aspx) security in .net 2.0)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes these would be competing languages, but now the main difference is that IronRuby will be created by Microsoft, and with that based on the DLR while Gardens Point is doing its own &#8220;DLR&#8221; with ruby, the way the DLR is expected to work is that it will be used by any Dynamic Languages, like IronPython, IronRuby, Visual Basic X, and Managed Javascript(forgive the naming i think there are 4 main dynamic languages supported on DLR for now) all taking advantage of DLR and then also supported for Silverlight support.  </p>
<p>I am not familiar with Gardens Point, however i think IronRuby and DLR will have its own CoreCLR supporting security (using transparent (<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa/archive/2005/08/31/458641.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa/archive/2005/08/31/458641.aspx</a>) security in .net 2.0)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Iron Ruby Released pre-alpha by Boy Bawang</title>
		<link>http://sliverlight.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/ironruby-released-pre-alpha/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Boy Bawang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sliverlight.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/ironruby-released-pre-alpha/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>So How does IronRuby compare against Gardens Point Ruby? Do these products really compete against eachother?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So How does IronRuby compare against Gardens Point Ruby? Do these products really compete against eachother?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
